Material Selection Guide

Compare FFKM, FKM, EPDM, NBR, and rubber compounds for o-rings and gaskets.

How To Choose the Right Elastomer

Selecting the correct sealing material begins with understanding the media, temperature range, pressure, and motion profile that the seal must withstand. Start by mapping operating conditions, then match those requirements to elastomer families with compatible performance envelopes.

Consider regulatory obligations (FDA, USP, NSF), reliability targets, maintenance windows, and any installation constraints. The table below highlights core attributes to help you narrow the field before engaging Garlast engineers for fine tuning.

Key Evaluation Criteria

  • Chemical compatibility with process media and cleaning agents
  • Continuous and peak temperature exposure
  • Required regulatory or cleanliness certifications
  • Compression set and resilience over service life
  • Dynamic vs. static sealing configuration
  • Hardware design: groove dimensions, surface finish, tolerance stack-up

Material Comparison Snapshot

Material Temp Range (°C) Chemical Resistance Common Applications Certifications Available
Garlast® FFKM -42 to +316* Outstanding (acids, bases, solvents, plasmas, strong oxidants) Semiconductors, chemical processing, aerospace, oil & gas, food & pharmaceutical USP Class VI, FDA 21 CFR, SEMI F57
Garlast® 1075/1065/1090/1095 (1075 vs Kalrez® 2035) -15 to +230 Excellent (wide range) General chemical processing
Garlast® 2075/2090/2175 (2075 vs Kalrez® 4079) -15 to +316 Excellent (high temp) High temperature applications
Garlast® 3075/3090 (3075 vs Kalrez® 7375) -15 to +300 Excellent (hot water & steam) Steam, CIP/SIP, water vapor service
Garlast® 4075 (vs Kalrez® 6221) -15 to +230 Excellent (FDA compliant) Food & pharmaceutical FDA 21 CFR
Garlast® 6075 (vs Kalrez® 1050LF) -15 to +230 Excellent (high-temperature amines) Amine-rich chemical processing
Garlast® 6378 (vs Kalrez® 6375) -15 to +275 Excellent (broad chemical resistance) High-temperature general chemical processing
Garlast® 6091 (vs Kalrez® 0090) -15 to +230 Excellent (EDR / explosion-decompression) Downhole oil & gas, rapid decompression
Garlast® 7080 / 7092 (vs Kalrez® 7075 / 7090) -15 to +325 Excellent (maximum service temperature) Extreme high-temperature sealing
Garlast® 9075 (vs Kalrez® 0040) -42 to +230 Excellent (low temp) Cryogenic applications
FKM (Fluoroelastomer) -20 to +200 Excellent (fuels, oils, many solvents) Automotive powertrain, oil & gas, general industry ASTM D2000, FDA grades available
HNBR -40 to +150 Very Good (fuel blends, ozone, hot oils) Automotive driveline, oilfield, industrial machinery OEM specifications, SAE
EPDM -50 to +150 Excellent (steam, water, polar fluids) Food & beverage, life sciences, HVAC, water treatment FDA 21 CFR, 3-A, NSF/ANSI 61
Silicone -60 to +200 Good (dry heat, ozone, limited fuel resistance) Medical devices, electronics, extreme cold environments USP Class VI, ISO 10993, FDA
PTFE & Blends -200 to +260 Inert to nearly all chemicals High-purity fluids, cryogenic applications, valve seats FDA, USP Class VI, NSF

* Temperature range varies by Garlast® grade. See the comparison tables below for detailed grade specifications.

Garlast® FFKM Mechanical Properties Comparison

Compare mechanical properties across all Garlast® FFKM grades. PDF benchmark grades include the comparable Kalrez® reference below each grade name.

Category Grade Temperature Range (°C) Hardness (Shore A) 100% Modulus (MPa) Tensile Strength (MPa) Elongation at Break (%) Compression Set (%)*
230°C Grades 1075
vs Kalrez® 2035
-15 to +230 76 15.0 22.1 139 23
1065 -15 to +230 65 3.8 7.8 179 30
1090 -15 to +230 93 19.0 100 30
1095 -15 to +230 95 22.1 81 30
316°C Grades 2075
vs Kalrez® 4079
-15 to +316 74 9.3 14.7 177 19
2090 -15 to +316 87 11.8 15.6 123 35
2175 -15 to +316 75 9.8 16.5 160 25
300°C Water/Vapor 3075
vs Kalrez® 7375
-15 to +300 76 12.5 16.4 144 25
3090 -15 to +300 92 15.8 17.6 111 23
275°C Grades 6378
vs Kalrez® 6375
-15 to +275 76 11.6 15.8 129 15
325°C Grades 7080
vs Kalrez® 7075
-15 to +325 80 12.5 17 153 14
7092
vs Kalrez® 7090
-15 to +325 90 12.5 17 153 14
Specialty Grades 4075
vs Kalrez® 6221
-15 to +230 73 7.4 13.8 175 22
5080 -20 to +230 79 8.4 12.6 165 35
6075
vs Kalrez® 1050LF
-15 to +230 75 6.3 21.4 194 19
6091
vs Kalrez® 0090
-15 to +230 90 18.4 20.1 118 26
9075
vs Kalrez® 0040
-42 to +230 75 4.3 16.7 257 30

* Compression set values measured after 70 h at 204 °C.

Test Methods: Hardness - ASTM D2240; Modulus & Tensile Strength - ASTM D412, 500mm/min; Elongation - ASTM D412, 500mm/min; Compression Set - ASTM D395B, 214-O-RING

Garlast® FFKM Chemical Media Resistance Comparison

Compare chemical resistance ratings across all Garlast® FFKM grades. Grades benchmarked in the Garlast vs Kalrez® guide show the comparable Kalrez® reference below each grade name; dark green cells highlight documented Garlast® advantages.

Category Grade Aromatic/aliphatic hydrocarbon-based oils Acids Alkalis Alcohols Aldehydes Amines Ethers Esters Ketones Superheated water, water vapor Strong oxidants Ethylene oxide / propylene oxide Hot air
230°C Grades 1075
vs Kalrez® 2035
Excellent Excellent Good Excellent Excellent Fair Excellent Excellent Excellent Good Fair Excellent Fair
1065 Excellent Excellent Excellent Excellent Excellent Good Excellent Excellent Excellent Excellent Fair Excellent Fair
1090 Excellent Excellent Excellent Excellent Excellent Good Excellent Excellent Excellent Excellent Fair Excellent Fair
1095 Excellent Excellent Excellent Excellent Excellent Good Excellent Excellent Excellent Excellent Fair Excellent Fair
316°C Grades* 2075
vs Kalrez® 4079
Excellent Excellent Good Excellent Good Poor Excellent Excellent Excellent Poor Fair N/A Excellent
2090 Excellent Excellent Good Excellent Good Poor Excellent Excellent Excellent Poor Fair N/A Excellent
2175 Excellent Excellent Good Excellent Good Poor Excellent Excellent Excellent Poor Fair N/A Excellent
300°C Water/Vapor 3075
vs Kalrez® 7375
Excellent Good Good Excellent Excellent Fair Excellent Excellent Excellent Excellent Fair Excellent Good
3090 Excellent Excellent Excellent Excellent Excellent Good Excellent Excellent Excellent Excellent Fair Excellent Good
275°C Grades 6378
vs Kalrez® 6375
Excellent Excellent Excellent Excellent Excellent Poor Excellent Excellent Excellent Excellent Fair Excellent Good
325°C Grades 7080
vs Kalrez® 7075
Excellent Excellent Good Excellent Excellent Fair Excellent Excellent Excellent Fair Fair Good Excellent
7092
vs Kalrez® 7090
Excellent Excellent Good Excellent Excellent Fair Excellent Excellent Excellent Fair Fair Good Excellent
Specialty Grades 4075
vs Kalrez® 6221
Excellent Excellent Good Excellent Excellent Fair Excellent Excellent Excellent Good Fair Excellent Fair
5080 Excellent Excellent Excellent Excellent Excellent Good Excellent Excellent Excellent Excellent Excellent Excellent Good
6075
vs Kalrez® 1050LF
Excellent Excellent Good Excellent Excellent Excellent Excellent Excellent Excellent Good Fair Excellent Fair
6091
vs Kalrez® 0090
Excellent Excellent Good Excellent Excellent Excellent Excellent Excellent Excellent Good Fair Excellent Fair
9075
vs Kalrez® 0040
Excellent Excellent Good Excellent Excellent Fair Excellent Excellent Excellent Good Fair Excellent Fair

Rating Legend: (++++ Excellent · +++ Good · ++ Fair · + Poor · × N/A) Excellent Good Fair Poor N/A

* 2075, 2090, and 2175 are not intended for use with amines, superheated water/vapor, or ethylene/propylene oxide.
** 5080 is specifically designed for strong oxidizing media (halogens, thermo-oxidizing acids).
*** 6075 is specifically designed for high-temperature amine resistance (>70°C).
For detailed specifications and application guidance, contact Garlast technical support.

Garlast® vs Kalrez® — Documented Performance Advantages

The following grades show measurable advantages over the comparable Kalrez® reference grade in Garlast internal testing (see Garlast Vs Kalrez comparison guide). Dark green cells in the chemical resistance table above mark the same advantages.

Garlast® Grade Comparable Kalrez® Grade Primary Advantage Garlast Rating Application Notes
1075 2035 Ethylene oxide / propylene oxide Excellent Kalrez® 2035 rated not applicable (×) for EtO/PO; Garlast® 1075 rated Excellent
2075 4079 Hot air Excellent Superior hot-air aging at 316 °C continuous service
3075 7375 Superheated water & steam Excellent Steam and hot-water resistance for 300 °C service
6075 1050LF Amines Excellent High-temperature amine environments (>70 °C)
6378 6375 Superheated water & steam Excellent Extended chemical envelope to 275 °C with improved steam resistance
7080 7075 Hot air; maximum service temperature Excellent / 325 °C Highest continuous-use temperature in the Garlast® line
7092 7090 Hot air; maximum service temperature Excellent / 325 °C High-hardness (90 Shore A) grade for extreme temperature sealing
9075 0040 Minimum service temperature −42 °C Lowest minimum operating temperature vs comparable Kalrez® grade (−15 °C)
Advantage cell in chemical resistance table

Chemical resistance scale: ++++ Excellent · +++ Good · ++ Fair · + Poor · × Not applicable. Kalrez® is a registered trademark of DuPont de Nemours, Inc.

Material Selection Workflow

1. Define the Environment

Document continuous and intermittent temperatures, exposure duration, chemical media, and any cleaning protocols (CIP/SIP, solvent flushes, sterilization).

2. Confirm Compliance Needs

Note industry standards, regulatory requirements, and customer specifications that the material must satisfy (e.g., FDA, USP, NSF, NORSOK, SEMI).

3. Match Material Families

Use the comparison table above to shortlist elastomer families that meet chemical and thermal demands. Evaluate trade-offs such as cost, availability, and mechanical properties.

4. Validate In Application

Review groove design, compression, and hardware tolerances. Request Garlast samples or lab testing to confirm compression set, swell, and compatibility before production release.